2010

SpeechNow.org et. al. v. FEC

full text of opinion

SpeechNow.org

While Citizens United set the stage for super PACs, the SpeechNow case, argued in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, made them official. The decision struck down federal contribution limits to independent expenditure committees. It found that the high court’s analysis in Citizens United required the lower court to conclude that “the government has no anti-corruption interest in limiting contributions to an independent expenditure group.” The court, however, upheld the political committee disclosure requirements, so the donors to super PACs must be reported.

Source: FEC

Attorneys for the appellants:

  • Steven M. Simpson
  • William H. Mellor
  • Robert W. Gall
  • Robert P. Frommer
  • Paul M. Sherman
  • Stephen M. Hoersting
  • Heidi K. Abegg and Alan P. Dye were on the briefs for amici curiae Alliance for Justice, et al. in support of appellants

Attorneys for the appellees:

  • David B. Kolker, Associate General Counsel, FEC
  • Vivien Clair, Attorney
  • Joseph G. Hebert, Donald J. Simon, Scott L. Nelson, Fred Wertheimer were on the briefs for amici curiae Campaign Legal Center and Democracy 21
  • Howard R. Rubin was on the briefs for amici curiae The Brennan Center for Justice and Professor Richard Briffault in support of appellee

Source: Justia

Amicus/intervenor filings:

  • For a list of amicus and intervenor filings, visit the Campaign Legal Center’s resource.

Sources: Campaign Legal Center, SCOTUSblog, FEC, The Brennan Center