1976

Buckley v. Valeo

text of decision

James L. Buckley

This landmark case created the legal foundation for the Citizens United v. FEC decision issued 34 years later. The Supreme Court upheld contribution limits. However, it overturned spending limits (except for publicly financed presidential candidates). The decision said such restrictions “limit political expression at the core of our electoral process and of the First Amendment freedoms." The court upheld disclosure and recordkeeping requirements. In addition to striking down limits on candidate expenditures, the decision also invalidated limits on independent spending (spending not coordinated with a candidate) and on expenditures of candidates’ personal funds.

Source: FEC

Appellants:

  • James L. Buckley — U.S. Senator from New York, elected in 1970 as a Conservative Party candidate
  • Eugene McCarthy — Presidential candidate who challenged Hubert Humphrey for the 1968 Democratic presidential nomination on anti-war platform
  • Committee for a Constitutional Presidency - McCarthy '76 — McCarthy’s campaign committee
  • Stewart Mott — Prominent anti-war donor
  • New York Civil Liberties Union
  • Republican Party of Mississippi
  • Libertarian Party
  • Conservative Party of New York
  • Human Events — Weekly newspaper
  • William Steiger — Republican congressman from Wisconsin
  • The American Conservative Union
  • The Conservative Victory Fund

Attorneys for the appellants:

  • Ralph K. Winter, Jr.
  • Joel M. Gora
  • Brice M. Claggett

Appellees:

  • Secretary of the Senate Francis Valeo
  • Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives
  • Comptroller General
  • Attorney General
  • Federal Election Commission

Attorneys for the appellees:

  • Daniel M. Friedman
  • Archibald Cox
  • Lloyd M. Cutler
  • Ralph S. Spritzer

Sources: Oyez, Encyclopedia.com